“I realized that if I am brave enough to let people watch me enjoying sex, then I don’t have shame for anything else.”
Travel - Consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labour
Fashion - Consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt
News - Consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labour
“I realized that if I am brave enough to let people watch me enjoying sex, then I don’t have shame for anything else.”
The U.S. Supreme Court voted 5-4 Tuesday to shoot down a Texas law that would have significantly hindered the ability of social media platforms to moderate content.
In a peculiar alliance, Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Stephen Breyer, Brett Kavanaugh, John Roberts, and Sonia Sotomayor joined forces to block Texas House Bill 20.
Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Elena Kagan, and Clarence Thomas dissented.
HB 20 vowed to protect “Texans from wrongful censorship on social media platforms.” It was signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott (R-TX) last September.
Abbott said at the time:
Social media websites have become our modern-day public square. They are a place for healthy public debate where information should be able to flow freely — but there is a dangerous movement by social media companies to silence conservative viewpoints and ideas. That is wrong, and we will not allow it in Texas.
Opponents argued the law, if applied to large platforms, would have forced them to allow hate speech, illegal content, dangerous rhetoric, and trends that put children in danger — such as the Tide Pod challenge.
NBC News reported a challenge to HB 20 was filed by the trade groups NetChoice and the Computer and Communications Industry Association.
An injunction to block the law was issued by a federal judge, but was later lifted by the U.S. Court of the Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Alito issued a dissenting opinion from the court minority.
Texas lawmakers authored HB 20 last year amid complaints social media companies were censoring conservatives. A press release from Abbott’s office read:
House Bill 20 prevents social media companies with more than 50 million monthly users banning users simply based on their political viewpoints. The law also requires several consumer protection disclosures and processes related to content management on the social media sites to which the bill applies.
These sites must disclose their content management and moderation policies and implement a complaint and appeals process for content they remove, providing a reason for the removal and a review of their decision. They also must review and remove illegal content within 48 hours. House Bill 20 also prohibits email service providers from impeding the transmission of email messages based on content.
Have a tip we should know? email@example.com
() => (function(d, s, id)
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s);
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”;
(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’))
The post SCOTUS Votes 5-4 to Block TX Social Media Content Bill appeared first on 10z viral.
Isimemen Etute says he thought Jerry Paul Smith was a woman when they met for sex. He later beat Smith to death.
An advisor for the Biden administration’s Ministry of Truth once suggested that discouraging differences in opinion at the government level was a bad thing. Irony abounds!
Disinformation Governance Board (DGB) advisor Michael Chertoff signed a letter in 2016 criticizing then-presidential candidate Donald Trump for apparently discouraging “conflicting views.” Signers of the letter said regarding a potential Trump presidency: “In our experience, a President must be willing to listen to his advisors and department heads; must encourage consideration of conflicting views; and must acknowledge errors and learn from them.”
Chertoff’s current positions are ironic in light of that letter he signed opposing Trump’s bid for the presidency. The letter argued, among other things, that Trump did not encourage free speech enough.
More than 20 foreign policy and national security experts who served under Republican administrations, including Chertoff, signed the August 2016 letter. One sentence slammed Trump for supposedly lacking “basic knowledge about and belief in the U.S. Constitution, U.S. laws, and U.S. institutions,” including “freedom of the press.”
Chertoff suddenly seems less concerned about a free press now that he’s advising a censorship board.
The letter also claimed that Trump was not likely to “encourage consideration of conflicting views.” The letter’s signers used that same phrasing a second time for emphasis: “He does not encourage conflicting views.” How does the DGB fit into a philosophy of encouraging “conflicting views”?
The Biden administration recently appointed former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff to advise the Orwellian DGB, which has paused but not disbanded. Leftist globalist billionaires George Soros and Bill Gates donated large sums to the Aspen Institute, where Chertoff holds a position as Aspen Cybersecurity Group Ex-Officio Member. Chertoff, while working for the George W. Bush administration, was co-author of the Patriot Act, arguably a harsh crackdown on civil liberties.
Chertoff is not the only DGB pick who raised red flags. MRC Business found that DGB co-chair Jennifer Daskal has at least three connections to Soros. She served as an Open Society Institute fellow “working on issues related to privacy and law enforcement access to data across borders,” according to her professional bio for American University, where she worked as a law professor. Daskal also was senior counterterrorism counsel for the anti-Semitic Human Rights Watch, which received at least $32,106,746 from Soros between 2000 and 2014. Daskal was also founding editor of the Just Security blog, which received $675,000 from Open Society Foundations between 2017 and 2019.
Conservatives are under attack. Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us using CensorTrack’s contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable.
The post Irony! Biden Disinfo Board Advisor Once Hinted Discouraging ‘Conflicting Views’ Was Bad appeared first on 10z viral.
The recent college graduate and first known transgender athlete to win an NCAA swimming championship said she intends to keep swimming.
Simon Cowell made a savage dig at ‘boring politicians’ while sharing his critique after a Britain’s Got Talent semi-final performance, comparing them to a children’s choir.
Tonight, the live shows of the ITV competition continue ahead of Sunday’s grand final, when a winner will be crowned for the 2022 series.
The second act to perform during Tuesday’s heat was the Armed Forces Children’s Choir, a group made up of kids whose parents are in the armed forces.
Several of the children broke down in tears during the heartfelt song, as judge Amanda Holden told them that she thought it was ‘one of the most emotional and courageous performances’ she had ever seen on the show.
Next came Simon’s turn to deliver feedback, as he told the choir: ‘All of you were amazing. I think remembering that all of your mums and dads are in the armed forces, which is why this choir came together.
‘If you think about what’s happening in the world right now with the jubilee, it’s so interesting how a bunch of really talented kids can make a much stronger message than a bunch of boring politicians.’
The media mogul continued, telling the choir that their performance ‘was everything we would have wanted from you in the finals’.
‘I’m so proud of all of you, congratulations. And I love the song as well by the way,’ he added.
The choir were invited to take part in Britain’s Got Talent after Simon paid them a personal visit during a rehearsal.
On Monday evening, the first semi-final of the 2022 series saw busker Maxwell Thorpe and ventriloquist Jamie Leahey soar through to the final stage of the competition.
Maxwell won the public vote, leaving the decision up to the judges to choose between comedian Jamie and magician Junwoo.
The haunting Witch act made a chilling return during the live show, although several viewers were disgruntled by the judges speaking over the performance.
‘The Witches act on #BritainsGotTalent was ruined by the judges making it all about them with constant jokes whilst the Witch was trying to do their thing; ruined the momentum and took away the scary edge,’ one person wrote.
‘I’m sorry but the Audacity of the judges tonight during #TheWitches#BGT#BritainsGotTalent Absolutely ruined that act they did. The Witches need to be bought back and re-do another act to make up for what the judges ruined,’ another remarked.
Britain’s Got Talent returns tomorrow at 8pm on ITV and ITV Hub.
Got a story?
If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us firstname.lastname@example.org, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.
MORE : Britain’s Got Talent: Why does David Walliams have a different chair?
MORE : Kirstie Allsopp thanks ‘loyal’ Amanda Holden for defending her on Britain’s Got Talent following trust fund jibe
window.fbApi = (function ()
var fbApiInit = false;
var awaitingReady = ;
var notifyQ = function ()
var i = 0,
l = awaitingReady.length;
for (i = 0; i < l; i++)
var ready = function (cb)
var checkLoaded = function ()
window.fbAsyncInit = function ()
fbApiInit = true;
'ready' : ready,
'loaded' : checkLoaded
if ( window.fbApi && window.fbApi.loaded() ) return;
var d = document,
id = 'facebook-jssdk';
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s);
js = d.createElement(s);
js.id = id;
js.async = true;
js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js";
window.addEventListener('scroll', injectFBSDK, once: true, passive: true);
window.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', injectFBSDK, once: true);
The post Britain’s Got Talent: Simon Cowell makes dig at ‘boring politicians’ appeared first on 10z viral.
The “Girls” and “Black Monday” actor is among of bevy of stars featured on composer Joe Iconis’ new album, due out June 17.
This residual harm, this chip on the shoulder, this something to prove — they’re proving it to the wrong person. They’re gay-tekeeping.
The post Competitive Queerness Gives Me the Ick appeared first on Autostraddle.
Kevin Spacey is “confident” he will clear his name after being charged with four counts of sexual assault.
The former ‘House of Cards’ star was charged by the Crown Prosecution Service in the UK over a number of incidents, which were alleged to have taken place between March 2005 and August 2008 in London, and in April 2013 in Gloucestershire, and following claims he was set to be formally extradited from the US to face the charges, the 62-year-old actor has now insisted he will “voluntarily” fly to England to appear in court.
He said in a statement released to ‘Good Morning America’: “I very much appreciate the Crown Prosecution Service’s statement in which they carefully reminded the media and the public that I am entitled to a fair trial, and innocent until proven otherwise.
“While I am disappointed with their decision to move forward, I will voluntarily appear in the U.K. as soon as can be arranged and defend myself against these charges, which I am confident will prove my innocence.”
It was announced last week Kevin would face charges of four counts of sexual assault against three men, and an additional charge of causing a person to engage in penetrative sexual activity without consent – is facing the allegations following a review of evidence collected by the Metropolitian Police.
The alleged incidents took place between March 2005 and August 2008 in London, and in April 2013 in Gloucestershire.
Rosemary Ainslie – head of the CPS Special Crime Division – said in a statement: “The CPS has authorised criminal charges against Kevin Spacey, 62, for four counts of sexual assault against three men.
“He has also been charged with causing a person to engage in penetrative sexual activity without consent.
“The charges follow a review of the evidence gathered by the Metropolitan Police in its investigation.
“The Crown Prosecution Service reminds all concerned that criminal proceedings against Mr Spacey are active and that he has the right to a fair trial.”
The ‘American Beauty’ actor has denied all allegations against him.
The charges come after a series of legal battles for the actor after allegations of sexual assault and misconduct were first made public in 2017 by actor Anthony Rapp, who alleged the star assaulted him when he was just 14 years old, after inviting him to his apartment for a party.
In the lawsuit, he claimed Spacey grabbed his backside without permission and then lifted him onto a bed, before climbing on top of him and said he still suffers from extreme emotional distress as a result.
In a statement in March, Spacey said: “I met [Rapp] several decades ago. I never had a sexual encounter with Mr. Rapp. Nor did I harbour any sexual interest or desire in Mr. Rapp at that time or any time.”
The lawsuit is set to go trial on October 4.
nor.pageviewURL = “https://log.nordot.jp/pageview”;nor.setPageData(opttype: “unknown”,pagetype: “detail”,conttype: “post”,uiid: “e_LCjfgWvHZ7”,postid: “904371239445315584”,contdata: title: “Kevin Spacey 'confident' he can clear his name”,numimg: 1,cvrimg: 0,pubdate: “1654005600”,chlang: “en-US”,chunitid: “641577452118279265”,cuunitid: “644607769890374753”);nor.pageview();
The early chapters of Colton Haynes’s new memoir, Miss Memory Lane, out 5/31, paint a portrait of a wild child bouncing from state to state with his unpredictable, alcoholic mother and, at times, his frequently violent father. Of a boy who learned all too early what his looks and sexuality could get for him—and more importantly what others could take. Of a teenage runaway, a precocious troublemaker, a wannabe model willing to do just about anything to get what he wanted.
But the Colton Haynes who gets on a Zoom call on a recent spring afternoon is a very different person. He’s measured and thoughtful, though still unflinchingly honest about the life that brought him to this moment. Confidently out in high school and his early 20s, he has written openly about the pressure he received from managers and other industry insiders to essentially go back in the closet at the beginning of his acting career. It’s a story most queer people probably won’t find surprising, but it’s one we rarely hear told so honestly, revealing the discrimination many queer performers face in the entertainment business.
QUEERTY: What made you decide to tell your story now?
HAYNES: I’d been asked a couple years ago to write a book, and I obviously wasn’t in the best headspace at that time. But I had this interaction at a comic convention a couple years back with this young queer kid. He just brought me to tears. It made me realize that I was still ashamed of a lot of the things that had happened so publicly a couple years back. But I realized that maybe my story or being open about my past might help a lot of people. And I lost my sister during the pandemic, and losing my parents, it didn’t worry me that I was 33 coming out with a memoir, because it really brought into perspective that we really never know how much time we have. I wanted to package all of this up in these chapters so I could hopefully start some new ones.
How did you decide how much to reveal, which stories to tell?
I just wanted to make sure that if I was going to do it, that I wasn’t going to be censored. It is a very dark, emotional…I do talk about a lot of sexual experience, and I wanted to make sure not only that it wasn’t a smear piece, because I don’t want to hurt people who’ve hurt me in the past, I just really wanted to authentically speak about my experiences. Basically, I have no other secrets left.
You describe a pretty chaotic childhood. Your family moved around a lot and your parents could be violent and unpredictable. How did that affect you?
In the moment, I didn’t know that other people weren’t experiencing these things. Because as a kid, that was my normal. We were on food stamps and fighting over the EBT card. Growing up in a situation like that and then becoming an adult trying to clean up a lot of those habits was pretty difficult for me. I’m definitely still on that journey.
You reveal in the book that your uncle molested you when you were six years old. How did you understand what had happened to you? When did you realize that this was abuse?
The sexual things that were happening up until I went through puberty…I didn’t understand it until I became a teenager. When I went to write about it, I was talking about it how…I felt like he was the only person I met who was also gay. In my child brain, I didn’t really know that [what he was doing to me] was wrong. You don’t understand that that’s not something that should be happening. Once I realized that that set the tone for a lot of the sexual nature that I would journey through, really up until I became an adult, I realized that it was wrong. I’m still trying to kind of figure out now—being attracted to danger or wanting the people who don’t necessarily want me. I’ve taken a step back from a lot of those relationships and I’m trying to work on myself so I don’t hurt anyone. Trying to fix all that still, currently.
You describe a pretty harrowing experience of being asked to simulate sex in one of your first acting classes when you got to L.A. in 2007. Do you know if that kind of thing was typical? Is it now?
It worries me that it’s still going on. I almost don’t feel like that was the only class that that was going on. I would pray that it’s not going on in this day and age, let alone back then. Because the damage that it really has cause me… I’m still in contact with people who were also there with me. To be so young with this group of actors—there’s a handful of actual stars, people who have been nominated for Oscars, that were in that class. Every time I run into them, they say, “We survived that.” That happened to me pretty recently. It struck me: I thought I was the only person who was being affected by it because I was being targeted because I was the only one, at least that I knew of, who was gay. That experience, what it ultimately ended up doing is it made me a people pleaser, and it made me realize that I’d do anything that I could. I’ll be anyone that you want me to be. And I think that was hard for me, because I miss that person I was before I moved to Los Angeles. Sometimes I find myself hating the character that I’ve created.
You were told by your manager and others that your mannerisms were “too gay.” What do you think he was responding to?
It felt like there was something new every day. Which kept breaking my heart, but also pissing me off, because all I could think was, “Did my photo get me in the door? Was that all I was good for? My physical appearance?” It made me believe that everything that I was was not good enough. After being told that I needed to fix all of these things—as if everything that I was was broken—I began just having to go to all these movement classes and this speech therapist and learn how to stop blinking so hard like I was batting my eyelashes at people. Correcting the way that I walked. It became an attack on everything that I was.
It caught to me years later, because I didn’t realize that I was projecting an image. What I was doing, and why I was getting a lot of hate—I was basically saying to the gay people who were watching my stuff and who knew about me was, “You can be gay in the industry as long as you don’t say you are, and as long as you’re like me.” So, as long as you “fix” certain affects. Once I realized that I was projecting that message, it just broke my heart. That’s been something that’s still really hard for me. At the same time, it wasn’t all my fault, because I was being told that if I wanted to pursue my dreams, I couldn’t be anything like what I was.
It’s interesting to think about this: When an actor is told he seems “too gay,” he’s being told that there won’t be roles for him, which in a sense means there aren’t enough gay roles in films and on TV and also that Hollywood, America, etc. doesn’t want to see real gay people in the few roles there are. How does that make you feel about the industry?
[Laughs] Not hopeful. It doesn’t make me feel good about it at all. To be someone who learned all these things so I basically could fit my career around my jawline and my haircut and my cheekbones, to then learn how to play these straight roles, and then to come out of the closet and literally the only roles I get auditions for—let’s say 98 percent of the roles I get auditions for, which are few and far between—they are almost 100 percent gay best friend. The new one is gay dad. Basically since 2016, every role I get auditions for is gay. I’d never played a gay role until I came out, until Teen Wolf made [my character] gay because I came out. So, basically, having all these opportunities be formed around my personal life has been a really frustrating thing for me.
Do you have a sense of whether this is still going on? Are young performers still being pressured to go back into the closet?
I don’t personally know anyone who is struggling with it. But I know of people. What really breaks my heart is the longing for people to come out, but it’s the attacks that come after. Attacks that happened to me leading up to it, people saying the worst things about me on social media. And then after [I came out], it kind of continuing from within the community. That breaks my heart, because…to speculate about people and then just abandon them after, that sucks. It’s not a very good feeling, going through it. Recognizing when someone is really struggling with something and when someone’s open and honest about their struggles, I just want people to accept people more and to understand that they’re doing what they can to try to pursue their careers. I just really want acceptance, obviously from outside the community, and also from within the community. That’s the most important thing that I hope for.
Is the entertainment business homophobic? And I mean in the sense that, it’s full of people who are maybe personally pro-gay, or even LGBTQ themselves—but there’s still structural homophobia underlying decisions about what gets made and who gets work.
I think it all stems from: the industry is going to make whatever the audience is going to buy. The audience is homophobic. And therefore, if you think about it, the studio heads and whoever, they care about their way of thinking, which is very archaic. I think a lot of them think that gay doesn’t equal dollars. So many people are kicking through that door. Obviously, we’re proving people wrong. But I think there’s still a great deal of homophobia in the industry. I think just having one gay person play number six on a call sheet on your television show, I don’t think that that’s really showing that you’re not homophobic. I think it’s more important to have real queer stories as opposed to just packaging them in a way that is safe for audiences.